Cookie notice 

Human Factoring

Learn how we can Human-Factor your procedures and work instructions.

Hidden Risks, Major Impacts

The problem most organizations don't see until it's too late.

Your procedures exist. They have been reviewed, approved, and issued. On paper, the program is in compliance. But if the personnel executing those procedures are relying on them as their primary source of guidance, then what looks like a functioning program may actually be carrying significant latent risk. 

The most dangerous procedures are not the ones that are obviously wrong. They are the ones that look right but were written for a workforce that no longer exists, when the experienced personnel who could read a what-to-do step and know instinctively how to execute it leaves your organization. It is when that retiring workforce is replaced by newer, less experienced personnel, who need the procedures to tell them what to do and how to do it, that the document can fail at its most fundamental purpose. It is no longer a tool that guides human performance, but instead a quiet contributor to the very failures it was designed to prevent. The gap between what the procedure assumed and what the performer actually knows becomes the space where errors live. When the experienced workforce that once compensated for what the procedures didn't say walks out the door, what is left is not a capable workforce following a sufficient document, but a less experienced workforce exposed by one.

This is the problem our human-factoring procedure service is designed to solve for you.

How Protected Are You?

Before we rewrite a single step, we evaluate your procedures against a defined set of human performance error traps. These are the structural features of a procedure that increase the likelihood of error, regardless of how skilled or attentive your workforce might be.

We Can Identify Your Error Traps

We've seen it all, and we can help. 

 When we evaluate a procedure program against the full PPA standard, we assess for the 18 recognized error traps. The six below are the ones we find in nearly every program we review — which means there is a reasonable chance they are already present in yours. 

4. Vague Steps or Steps Missing Critical Detail
Steps that tell the performer what to accomplish without saying how leaves execution to individual judgment and creates inconsistency across performers and over time.
5. Multiple Actions or Objects in the Same Step
Steps that bundle more than one discrete action or object into a single instruction, increasing the likelihood that one action is missed, skipped, or performed out of sequence.
6. Atypical Action Steps
Steps written in passive voice or non-standard structure are harder to interpret and execute consistently. Action steps should be concise, active-voice commands and not descriptions of what should happen.
8. Inadequate Defense-in-Depth or Termination Criteria Not Specified
Procedures that account only for the expected outcome leave workers without guidance when results deviate, forcing improvisation under pressure and increasing the likelihood of error or unsafe conditions.
9. Actions or Acceptance Criteria Embedded in Notes, Cautions, or Warnings
Workers are conditioned to read supporting elements as context, not direction. Placing required actions or acceptance criteria inside notes, cautions, or warnings creates the conditions for them to be missed.
13. Excessive Physical Challenges
Steps that look straightforward on paper may be physically difficult or impractical in the field. This is one of the clearest examples of the "work-as-imagined" versus "work-as-done" gap — and one of the most preventable.

Our Process

Step 1

Procedure Intake and Baseline Evaluation

We begin by evaluating your existing procedures step by step against the Procedure Professionals Association standard PPA AP 907 005, the industry benchmark for human-factored procedure quality in high-risk environments. Every step is assessed for the 18 recognized error traps, and each finding is documented with the specific deficiency identified, the human performance risk it creates, and the revision required to address it. You receive a complete baseline evaluation before we change a word.

Step 2

Workforce and Task Alignment Review

We evaluate whether the level of detail in your procedures matches the experience level and performance mode of the workforce executing them. This is not a generic assessment. We look at the specific tasks your personnel perform, the experience profile of the workforce assigned to those tasks, and whether the procedure provides sufficient guidance for a performer at the current workforce level to execute each step correctly, completely, and consistently.

Step 3

Standards and Regulatory Traceability 

Where your procedures are written to implement a governing standard, satisfy a regulatory requirement, or meet your business needs — we verify that a clear and auditable connection exists between the requirement, the procedure step that implements it, and the training that ensures the performer can execute it. Where that connection is broken or unverifiable, we document the gap and build it into the revision scope.

Step 4

Human-Factored Revision

We rewrite your procedures from the step level up, not reformatting what exists, but redesigning each step to function as an engineered operational control. Steps are restructured to eliminate identified error traps, provide a balance between the what and the how, separate discrete actions, and place critical information where the performer will encounter it at the right point in the execution sequence.

Step 5

Validation and Quality Review

Revised procedures are validated against the tasks they govern: confirming that the revised steps accurately reflect field conditions, that acceptance criteria are observable and measurable, and that the document performs as intended in the hands of the workforce that will use it. Where subject matter expertise is required for validation, we coordinate with your personnel or provide our own.

Step 6

 Implementation Support

You receive fully revised procedures with a documented revision basis for every change made, traceable to the specific error trap identified, the standard requirement addressed, or the workforce alignment gap closed. We do not hand you a document and leave. We support implementation, answer questions from your procedure owners and field personnel, and remain available as your program evolves.

What You End Up With

This goes beyond cleaner procedures. We engineer them.

Documents that provide a balance between what and how, making sure the work is performed with the lowest possible risk at every step. Steps that do not leave compliance to individual judgment. Procedures that work for the workforce you have today — not the workforce you had a decade ago. And a defensible, documented basis for every revision that connects your procedures to your standards, your standards to your regulatory obligations, and your regulatory obligations to what actually happens in the field.

We treat your procedures the way we would treat our own. Because in high-risk operations, the procedure is not just a document. It is the last line of defense between a qualified performer and a preventable error.

We are ready to partner with you.

We don't just edit your procedures. We human factor them so people get home.